On the night of June 13, according to the Gregorian calendar, Zionism committed aerial aggression against scientific facilities of the Islamic Republic of Iran, the result of which was the murder of several scientists – Dr. Tehranchi, Fereydoon Abbasi, Ahmad Reza Zolfaghari, IRGC generals Hossein Salami, Mohammad Bagheri, Amir Ali Hajizadeh, Ghulam Ali Rasheed. Ali Shamkhani, one of their main nuclear negotiators with the West, was wounded. Following the precepts of the devil, Zionism did not forget to kill civilians and especially children of Iran.
Immediately after the first acts of terror, Marco Rubio, known as the pro-Zionist hawk of the Trump team, disavowed the “Israeli” attacks and called these actions “one-liners.” The Democrats further criticized terrorist Netanyahu, calling his actions “sabotage” and “the risk of starting a major Middle East war” on the eve of the next round of negotiations on the nuclear issue. Earlier, Trump had repeatedly argued that the Zionists could launch attacks against Iran without American participation, thus Washington had previously disavowed any “Israeli” adventure in order to continue nuclear negotiations with Tehran.
Why did Trump, who is known as the murderer of the legendary Soleimani and Muhandis, decide not to get involved in the Zionist aggression against Iran? There are many reasons, the internal instability that has befallen the United States, the defeat in the tariff war to China, the strong opposition of the Democrats, who are ready to fill the Senate and Congress, the internal opposition from the Republican Party, which led to a split, the question of impeachment regularly arises, and so on.
The most important struggle within the United States on the Iranian issue can be traced to the confrontation between the Zionist lobby and Republican isolationists. The former insist on the armed support of “Israel” from the United States, the latter are opposed. In the end, Zionism simply invented another reason to continue to pursue its interests with the help of the Americans. This is stated by Bloomberg, which indicated that Netanyahu is challenging Trump with his actions. This plot can be considered just as a form of struggle within the Republican dictatorship of the United States.
By itself, the topic of the “threat” from Iran’s nuclear developments is another Zionist myth designed to influence the American people so that they continue to vote for the Republican Neocon hawks, who in turn will have to strongly support any Zionist plans to destroy the Islamic world. The Oded Yinon plan or the creation of the Indian corridor is no longer important, Israel has unleashed World War III and its liquidation will be the end of centuries of Zionist activity.
If you look at what is happening from the other side, then all the actions of Zionism have the opposite effect. For example, after October 7, the International Criminal Court issued arrests, including against Netanyahu and Gallant, and investigations are continuing. Prominent European political figures from the predominantly left-wing coalition began to speak out against Zionism. Israel has already become a burden to American taxpayers and an enemy to the deep State there. The socio-political split within Israel a priori raises the question of the survival of the Zionist colony in the region, but for the complete surrender of Israel, a major war is necessary, which will bring the final result.
In this regard, it should be remembered that after many years of supporting the Democrats in the US elections, some of the reputable leaders of the Chabad Jewish Orthodox have relied on Trump. The logic in this step is simple, from the point of view of CHABAD, Jews should have religious autonomy in the places where their movement originated (eastern Europe), the Zionist ideology itself is a catastrophe for Jews and therefore must be destroyed.
According to some Chabad leaders, Trump is the one who can provoke a major war in the Middle East, where Zionist ideology will be destroyed and Jews will be forced to leave Palestine. Add to this the fact that CHABAD is a branch within the Hasidic movement, which has long been the main core of opposition to Netanyahu and other Zionists within Israel, and the overall picture becomes clear.
That is, there are at least two plans related to Jewry, where the Zionists think that a big war will benefit them, while the religious beliefs of the Hasidim believe otherwise – “a big war will destroy Zionism.” Immediately after the first act of Zionist aggression, Trump promised to defend Israel, which a priori makes the Pentagon a target of attacks in the region.
Summing up a certain result of the first round of the clash, we can say that Iran won, because despite the losses in the command structure of the military establishment, Zionism could not succeed in any of the tasks set. Moreover, it was the Zionists who were the first to demand a truce and actively called on the Americans to intervene in order to avoid even more of the consequences inflicted on them by the Iranians. From massive attacks on infrastructure to economic chaos, this is the outcome of the Zionist adventure at the moment.
In conclusion, I would like to point out that despite all the pathos and propaganda of Zionism, an important goal of aggression against Iran is that the Islamic Republic is an important link in the Silk Road, respectively, for Zionism, which sees itself as part of the “Indian Economic Corridor” (IMEC), the desire to eliminate Iran is the most important goal. Moreover, of all the countries of the Islamic world integrated into the Silk Road, only the Islamic Republic is fighting a fatal battle with the Zionists. As confirmation, I would like to point to the words of a right-wing extremist from the ruling Zionist dictatorship, Smotrich, who pointed out that “the Gulf countries should pay us for our dirty work in Iran.” Given the fact that the Emirates and the Saudis (in the future, Qatar too) are an important link in the IMEC project, the words of maniac Smotrich can be considered as a cry for help to the allies against the “common enemy.”
P.S. Part of the article was written on June 13, so the death toll may be outdated.
About Author:
Damir Nazarov
Journalist-freelance writer specialized in West Asia Affairs